Leading Criminal Defence Lawyers in Melbourne for Commonwealth Offences
Commonwealth criminal offences are prosecuted under federal law by the CDPP following investigation by the AFP, ATO, ASIC, or other Commonwealth agencies. The procedural framework, sentencing regime, and parallel consequences under Commonwealth legislation differ in important respects from Victorian state criminal practice. All lawyers profiled below are established Victorian criminal defence practitioners, with several recognised by Doyle's Guide and Best Lawyers.
1. Bill Doogue, Doogue + George Defence Lawyers
The matters at the centre of Bill Doogue's practice are those at the serious commercial end of Australian criminal law: tax fraud, white collar crime, foreign bribery, complex commercial crime, and cross-border matters involving overseas agencies or evidence. He is Director of Doogue + George Defence Lawyers, ranked Pre-eminent in Criminal Law Defence by Doyle's Guide, and listed in Best Lawyers for Criminal Defence (2025).
He was admitted to practice in 1991 and became an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist in 1998. His courts span Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, and South Australia. He has appeared before the High Court of Australia and on behalf of clients at Royal Commission hearings. In Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Singapore he provides criminal defence advisory services, giving him direct experience in the jurisdictions most commonly relevant to Australian cross-border matters.
Coverage of his work has appeared in The Age, The Australian, The Guardian, CNN, and the Daily Mail. He was Chairperson of the Broadmeadows Community Legal Centre for over a decade. He is also a founding member of the Australian Defence Lawyers Alliance and is involved in running the Australian Criminal Lawyers Conference. He established the firm in 1995 and it has defended more than 40,000 prosecutions in the years since.
2. Tony Hargreaves, Tony Hargreaves and Associates
Doyle's Guide awards the Pre-eminent tier to a small number of Victorian criminal defence practitioners identified through peer review as the most senior in the profession. Tony Hargreaves holds that ranking in Criminal Law Defence for 2026. He is Principal of Tony Hargreaves and Associates and has at least 30 years of practice in serious criminal defence across Victorian and Federal jurisdictions.
He operates as both solicitor advocate and instructor, which means he can run contested matters at hearing himself or instruct counsel as the brief requires. He heads his own boutique, which means the named senior practitioner is present throughout each matter rather than the brief being handled at a junior level. For serious indictable matters where the Doyle's Pre-eminent ranking is the primary selection criterion, his standing places him at the top of the Victorian profession.
3. Angus Cameron, Angus Cameron and Associates
Angus Cameron conducts the matters he takes on directly, as Principal of Angus Cameron and Associates. He holds dual roles as Partner and Director of the boutique, and is listed by Doyle's Guide as Recommended in Criminal Law Defence for 2026. The Recommended recognition is the product of peer review within the Victorian criminal defence profession.
He practises as both solicitor advocate and instructor, with the capacity to run contested matters at hearing himself or instruct counsel as the brief requires. The combination of Doyle's peer-reviewed recognition, direct personal conduct of matters, and the dual solicitor-advocate model provides referrers with a clear and specific picture of what engagement with his practice involves.
4. Chen Yang, Paul Vale and Associates
Serious indictable matters in Victoria are the focus of Chen Yang's practice as Partner and Director of Paul Vale and Associates. He is known among peers for thorough preparation of contested briefs, a quality that is specifically relevant at the indictable end where the prosecution case is typically voluminous and the preparation advantage material. He practises in both English and Mandarin.
He operates as both solicitor advocate and instructor. The bilingual practice extends his capacity to run matters directly where the client or the evidence involves Mandarin, which arises in some cross-cultural or international serious indictable matters. Both features are verified from the reference material.
Selection of counsel depends on the nature of the charge, the court and jurisdiction involved, the stage of proceedings, and the specific circumstances of the matter. Early engagement of senior criminal defence representation materially affects outcomes. The practitioners profiled above are a verified starting point for informed referral within Victorian criminal defence.

